I think your note on the bottom actually does support your theory. Isn’t the theory that showing the extreme in any area people are dealing with is most effective? So you show extreme mental health examples for those dealing with that. I might have read your note wrong but it seemed to me that you were throwing out your principle only because you haven’t found written down severe mental health vignettes yet. Or are you saying the mental health people attending Resilient do not like the extreme?
You are right. But the problem is that of mission drift. If we write questions and scenarios for mentally ill people, what happens to the experience for the addicts who attend?
I think your note on the bottom actually does support your theory. Isn’t the theory that showing the extreme in any area people are dealing with is most effective? So you show extreme mental health examples for those dealing with that. I might have read your note wrong but it seemed to me that you were throwing out your principle only because you haven’t found written down severe mental health vignettes yet. Or are you saying the mental health people attending Resilient do not like the extreme?
You are right. But the problem is that of mission drift. If we write questions and scenarios for mentally ill people, what happens to the experience for the addicts who attend?